Legal Opinion

Janicki v. Lorek

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 16, 1961No. 166PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMooee, J.

There are two assignments of error: (1) “. . . to the court answering issue #4 ‘yes.’ ” (2) “. . . to the signing of the judgment . . . .”

As to the first assignment, plaintiffs contend: “. . . that no statute of limitations applies in the instant case and no statute of limitations was pleaded.” As to the second assignment, plaintiffs say: “They seek a free and unobstructed use of Cedar Street, as shown on Exhibits. . . . There has been no attempt to withdraw the dedication of this street from the dedication made by the recording of the Map recorded in Book 59, at page 597, Exhibit C.”

The…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Town of Blowing Rock v. GregorieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Keystone Driller Co. v. WorthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  3. Higdon v. JaffaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. Milliken v. Denny.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  5. Craven County v. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. River Birch Associates v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. State Highway Commission v. ThorntonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Overton v. OvertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Wofford v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. Brazer v. Borough of MountainsideSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API