Legal Opinion

State v. Sanders

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 1971No. 76PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HIGGINS, Justice.

The defendant assigns as error the failure of the court to sustain his objection to the evidence of Dr. Kelman who performed the autopsy. The court found Dr. Kelman to be a medical expert and a qualified pathologist. When the solicitor asked Dr. Kelman what he found to have been the cause of death, the defendant objected. Without ruling on the objection, the court reframed the question and the doctor answered that he found four bullet wounds in the body of I. J. Adams, one of which had passed entirely through the body. Three other bullets had penetrated from the back and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. TinsleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Hall v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. State v. . HugginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  4. State v. . ParksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. State v. HarbisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. State v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. State v. HarmanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. FennellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API