Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. Edwards

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 2, 1980No. 7910SC1105PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERWIN, Judge.

Respondent Hoffman (original petitioner)'sought to invoke the habeas corpus jurisdiction of the trial court pursuant to G.S. 17-7.

G.S. 17-1 provides that “[ejvery person restrained of his liberty is entitled to a remedy to inquire into the lawfulness thereof, and to remove the same, if unlawful; and such remedy ought not to be denied or delayed,” while G.S. 17-2 provides that “[t]he privileges of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended.” These two statutes are the statutory codification of Article I, § 21 of the North Carolina Constitution which provides:

“Sec. 21.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re BurtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. State v. TowerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  3. Hall v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Church v. Madison County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  5. Matter of Imprisonment of StevensCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. LeachCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  2. Hyatt v. CallahanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2026
  3. Osborne v. ParisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
  4. Osborne v. ParisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
  5. State of N. Carolina v. Todd Emerson CollinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API