Legal Opinion

S. B. Parker Co. v. Commercial National Bank

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 11, 1931PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

As the record contains no statement of case on appeal, we are limited to the question whether there is error in the judgment, the appeal itself being an exception thereto. Wallace v. Salisbury, 147 N. C., 58, 60 S. E., 713; R. R. v. Stewart, 132 N. C., 248, 43 S. E., 638; Clark v. Peebles, 120 N. C., 31, 26 S. E., 924.

Conceding that under the decisions cited and relied upon by the defendants, Waters v. Garris, 188 N. C., 305, 124 S. E., 334, Miller v. Dunn, 188 N. C., 397, 124 S. E., 746, and others of like import, plaintiffs would not be entitled to injunctive relief as a deliverance from…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wallace v. . SalisburySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  2. Waters v. GarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  3. Seip v. . WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  4. Hurwitz v. Carolina Sand & Gravel Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Miller v. . DunnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Dixon v. . OsborneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. Russos v. . BaileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. Huskins v. Yancey HospitalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Hall v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. Wilson v. Union Trust Co. of MarylandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API