Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Couts v. County of San Diego

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 14, 1934No. Civ. No. 1131PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAINES, J., pro tem.

In the early part of June, 1932, the board of supervisors of San Diego County undertook to appoint one J. W. Cole as county road superintendent, at a salary of $3,600 per year, such duties and salary to begin as of July 1, 1932, and on June 6, 1932, adopted a resolution in the words and figures following:

*707“In the Matter of tbe County Road Superintendent:
“Resolution Defining Duties of County Road Superintendent.
“Whereas, the Board of Supervisors has heretofore determined to employ a registered engineer as County Road Superintendent, and has selected J. W. Cole as such road…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Patton v. Board of Health Etc.California Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Teachout v. BogyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. County of Humboldt v. SternCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Skidmore v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Forward v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. DeGarmo v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Parker v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. State Ex Rel. Hamblen v. YelleWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  4. State Ex Rel. James v. AronsonMontana Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Skidmore v. County of AmadorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API