Legal Opinion

Teachout v. Bogy

California Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1917No. L. A. No. 4003PublishedCited by 33 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

The appeal is from the judgment, on.the judgment-roll alone.

The plaintiff, as assignee of Adloff & Hauerwaas Company, a corporation, and Goldschmidt Bros., a partnership, sued to recover money alleged to he due upon a contract executed on August 7, 1908, between the plaintiff’s assignors, as parties of the first part, and the defendants, doing business as Bogy Bros., as parties of the second part, and for damages for the breach of a covenant therein.

The material parts of the contract are as follows:

“For the consideration hereinafter expressed, to he paid in the manner, and at the times,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Clark v. City of Los AngeLesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Country of Plumas v. WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Vulcan Powder Co. v. Hercules Powder Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
  4. County of Humboldt v. SternCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Moffatt v. BulsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Keene v. HarlingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Tatterson v. KehrleinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. Haas v. GreenwaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Green v. FrahmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API