Legal Opinion

DeGarmo v. Goldman

California Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1942No. L. A. 17346PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDMONDS, J. —

The controversy between the parties to this litigation concerns the affairs of the Golden State Glass Corporation. G. C. DeGarmo, one of its stockholders, and also a director, under the authority of section 310 of the Civil Code, brought a suit against N. E. Shenberg and A. Goldman for the purpose of removing them as directors. As grounds for such removal, DeGarmo alleged that they had grossly abused their authority and had committed certain fraudulent and dishonest acts. In a second count of the complaint, it was alleged that the conduct of these directors had damaged the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Philpott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Bainbridge v. StonerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Wickersham v. CrittendenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Dulin v. Pacific Wood & Coal Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Morton v. BroderickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. East Bay Union of MacHinists, Local 1304California Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Trubowitch v. Riverbank Canning Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
  3. D. I. Chadbourne, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Brown v. GrimesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Gore v. BingamanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API