Legal Opinion
Haynes v. Navy Federal Credit Union
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 23, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2011-0614PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
Plaintiff James R. Haynes (“Haynes”) brings this action pro se against Defendant Navy Federal Credit Union (“NFCU”), asserting a variety of claims arising out of a home mortgage loan extended to him by NFCU. Currently before the Court is NFCU’s [13] Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (“Motion to Dismiss”). Upon consideration of the parties’ submissions, the relevant authorities, and the record as a whole, the motion shall be GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART. 1
I. BACKGROUND
A. Factual Background
Haynes resides at 5601 16th Street,…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Busby v. Capital One, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Mazza v. Verizon Washington, Dc, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Himmelstein v. Comcast of the District, L.L.C.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Haynes v. Navy Federal Credit UnionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Alemayehu v. AbereDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.