Legal Opinion
Alemayehu v. Abere
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 3, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2016-0596PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Neway Alemayehu brings this action alleging that three individuals, Belay Abere, Bekalu Bayabile, and Iyossias Tilahun (collectively, “Defendants”), worked together to defraud Mr. Alemaye-hu out of his $460,000 investment in a restaurant enterprise currently known as Amsterdam Café and Lounge. See generally Compl., ECF No. 1. Mr. Tilahun, proceeding pro se, has moved to dismiss Mr. Alemayehu’s complaint under Federal Rule of Civil…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Democracy Partners v. Project Veritas Action FundCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Alemayehu v. AbereCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Howad B. Silverberg v. Joanne S. BeckerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
- Howard v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Depu v. Yahoo! Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.