State v. Long
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
It is an essential element of the common law crime of arson that the burning was done or caused maliciously. S. v. Laughlin, 53 N.C. 455; S. v. Porter, 90 N.C. 719; S. v. McCarter, 98 N.C. 637, 4 S.E. 553; 4 Am. Jur., Arson, Sec. 2; 6 C.J.S., Arson, Sec. 1; Wharton’s Crim. Law, 12 Ed., Vol. 2, Sections 1051 and 1059; Miller's Crim. Law (Hornbook Series), p. 323; Curtis, The Law of Arson, Sections 1 and 68.
As a general rule an indictment for the common law crime of arson must allege that the burning was done maliciously. The omission to so charge is a fatal defect. D’Allesandro v. Tippins, 101…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- State v. CuthrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Jesse v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1854
- State v. . AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Commonwealth v. CooperMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- State v. Rowland Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. VickersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. SaultsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. ArnoldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- State v. GulleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.