State v. Vickers
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBritt, Justice
By his first assignment of error, defendant contends that he was denied effective assistance of counsel by the failure of his appointed attorney to investigate and raise an insanity defense. We find no merit in this assignment.
The right to counsel is guaranteed by the sixth amendment to the United States Constitution and made applicable to the states by the fourteenth amendment, and by Article I, Sections 19 and 23 of the North Carolina Constitution. This constitutional right to counsel has long been recognized as an entitlement to the effective assistance of counsel. McMann v. Richardson,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- North Carolina v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. FulcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Smith v. DixonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- State v. SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. WeaverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.