Legal Opinion

State v. Rowland Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 12, 1910PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from Goolce, J., at tbe May Term, 1910, of SampsoN. Tbe facts are sufficiently stated in tbe opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.

Tbe defendant lumber company and three of its employees were convicted for tearing down and removing a stable and fence in violation of Rev., 3686. Tbat section provides : “If any tenant shall, during bis term or after its expiration, wilfully and unlawfully demolish, destroy, injure or damage any tenement' house, uninhabited bouse, or other outhouse, belonging to his landlord or upon his premises, by removing parts thereof or by burning, or in any other manner, or shall unlawfully and wilfully burn, destroy, pull down, injure or remove any' fence, wall, or other, enclosure, ox any part…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. . WhitenerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  2. State v. . WhittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  3. State v. Godwin.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. State v. . CliftonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  5. State v. . R. P. RosemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Foster v. . HymanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  2. Brewer v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Givens v. SellarsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. State v. BirchfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. Siders v. GibbsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API