State v. Cuthrell
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
Throughout tbe charge tbe trial court seems to have assumed tbat tbe structure alleged to have been burned was “a building . . . used in carrying on . . . trade . . .” within tbe meaning of tbe statute (G.S. 14-62), whereas this involved disputed questions of fact which should have been determined by tbe jury under proper instructions by tbe court.
This statute makes it a felony to “. . . wantonly and wilfully . . . cause to be burned, or . . . procure tbe burning of (description of several types of building not pertinent to this case) or any building or erection used in carrying on any trade…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. . SingletonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- State v. . LoveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- State v. . PetersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Perry v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Cuthrell v. Milwaukee Mechanics InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. WellsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. PattersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Ash v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.