Legal Opinion

State v. Arnold

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 10, 1974No. 2PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice.

The sole question presented to this Court is whether the defendant can be lawfully convicted of the felony of attempt to commit arson (G.S. 14-67) on an indictment charging him with arson.

Arson is not defined by our statutes but is a common law offense. State v. Long, 243 N.C. 393, 396, 90 S.E. 2d 739, 741 (1956). See State v. Ingland, 278 N.C. 42, 49, 178 S.E. 2d 577, 581 (1970). By G.S. 14-58 arson is made a felony.

Defendant contends that there can he no lesser included offense of an attempt to commit arson under a bill of indictment for arson. Contrary to this contention,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. State v. GreerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. State v. OvermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. State v. RieraSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  5. State v. SurlesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. PalmerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. State v. WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. State v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API