Rivera v. Minnich
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens
The Pennsylvania statute governing proceedings brought against a defendant to establish his paternity of a child born out of wedlock specifies that the “burden of proof shall be by a preponderance of the evidence.”1 This appeal presents the question whether a determination of paternity by that evidentiary standard complies with the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. We agree with the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania’s conclusion that applying the preponderance standard to this determination is constitutionally permissible.
*576I
On May 28, 1983, appellee Jean Marie Minnich, an unmarried…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- M. L. B. v. S. L. J.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- R. v. Com., Dept. of Public WelfareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Dubay v. WellsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Coleman v. Anne Arundel County Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Department of Revenue v. JarvenpaaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.