Legal Opinion

John M. v. Paula T.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 19, 1990No. 31 E.D. Appeal Docket 1989PublishedCited by 100 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT *

LARSEN, Justice.

This appeal stems from a Petition for Custody and/or Visitation filed by John M., the appellee, wherein he sought to establish that he is the biological father of a girl-child born to Paula T. while she was married to Michael T., and wherein appellee sought to compel Michael T. to submit to Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) blood tests against his will. The issue presented is whether the trial court erred in refusing to order the husband to submit to such tests upon appellee’s Motion for Physical Examination pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P. 4010(a).

Appellee John M.…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Michael H. v. Gerald D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Cox v. Chesapeake & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Commonwealth v. SellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by100 opinions

  1. Brinkley v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. DEPT. OF HEALTH & REHAB. SERVICES v. PrivetteSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  3. Pettinato v. PettinatoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1990
  4. Jones v. TrojakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Stenger v. Lehigh Valley Hospital CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API