Legal Opinion

Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 12, 1966No. 40PublishedCited by 926 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stewart

The question presented by these cases is what burden of proof the Government must sustain in deportation proceedings. We have concluded that it is incumbent upon the Government in such proceedings to establish the facts supporting deportability by clear, unequivocal, and convincing evidence.

In Sherman (No. 80), the petitioner is a resident alien who entered this country from Poland in 1920 as a 14-year-old boy. In 1963 the Immigration and Naturalization Service instituted proceedings to deport him upon the ground that he had re-entered the United States in 1938, following a trip abroad,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Harisiades v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Schneiderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Baumgartner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Marcello v. BondsSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. Rutkin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by926 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

921 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API