Legal Opinion

Sharick v. Galloway

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 26, 1936No. Civ. 1764PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.

The plaintiff instituted this action against four defendants to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by him as the result of Ms being struck by an automobile which at the time of the accident was being operated by one of the defendants who is alleged to have been the agent of and employed by two other defendants. The fourth defendant, Mollie Galloway, is alleged to have been the owner of the automobile which at the time of the accident was being driven by the defendant, Boon, with her consent. The prayer of the complaint is for a judgment against the defendant…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. GoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Foss v. JohnstoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Harrelson v. Miller & Lux Inc.California Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Weyl v. Sonoma Valley R.R.California Supreme Court · 1886
  5. McMahon v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Greif v. DulleaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  2. Boehm v. County of MercedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. Pratt v. Robert S. Odell & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Primo Team, Inc. v. Blake Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. People v. DixonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API