Weyl v. Sonoma Valley R.R.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sonoma County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Foote, C.
The transcript in this cause being very defective was made intelligible by stipulation between counsel on both sides, and by a certificate of "the. clerk of the court below filed in this court under rule 12.
The respondent makes the point that the appeal is not well taken, and should not be considered, for the reason that the notice of appeal does not give the correct date of the entry of the judgment and order denying a new trial, from which the appeal is sought to be prosecuted.
The object of such a notice is to impart the requisite information to the opposite party of his opponent’s…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Moody v. PalmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- Coburn v. AmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
- Eddelbuttel v. DurrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Kittle v. PfeifferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
- Webber v. California & Oregon RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
3Cited by19 opinions
- Montgomery v. Santa Ana Westminster Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Foss v. JohnstoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Price v. Western Loan & Savings Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1909
- Paul v. CragnazNevada Supreme Court · 1900
- City of Redlands v. NickersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.