Legal Opinion

McMahon v. Hamilton

California Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1927No. Docket No. S.F. 12354PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Plaintiff and appellant herein presents a motion that this court vacate and set aside an order heretofore made which said order authorized the withdrawal of the transcript in this cause from the files of this court for the purpose of correcting and amending the same. The action was instituted to recover damages for injuries suffered by the plaintiff as a result of the defendant’s alleged negligence. After trial, the jury returned a verdict for the defendant and judgment was accordingly entered. Prom the judgment so entered the plaintiff prosecuted this appeal. The transcript filed…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Valentine v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. In re Estate of LambCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. People v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  4. Mendocino County v. PetersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
  5. Baker v. BorelloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Webster v. WebsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. See v. JoughinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Lynch v. CoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Tasker v. WarmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Dugan v. ForsterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API