Park v. Bd. of Trs. of the Cal. State Univ.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWerdegar, J.
*1060 To combat lawsuits designed to chill the exercise of free speech and petition rights (typically known as strategic lawsuits against public participation, or SLAPPs), the Legislature has authorized a special motion to strike claims that are based on a defendant's engagement in such protected activity. (See Code Civ. Proc., § 425.16, subd. (a).) We consider a question that has generated uncertainty in the Courts of Appeal: What nexus must a defendant show between a challenged claim and the defendant's protected activity for the claim to be struck?
**907 As we explain, a claim is not subject to…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Sweezy v. New Hampshire Ex Rel. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- University of Pennsylvania v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by234 opinions
- Wilson v. Cable News Network, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2019
- Monster Energy Company v. SchechterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- Coker v. SassoneNevada Supreme Court · 2019
- Sweetwater Union High Sch. Dist. v. Gilbane Bldg. Co.California Supreme Court · 2019
- Rand Resources, LLC v. City of CarsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
229 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.