Legal Opinion

Park v. Bd. of Trs. of the Cal. State Univ.

California Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 2017No. S229728PublishedCited by 234 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWerdegar, J.

*1060 To combat lawsuits designed to chill the exercise of free speech and petition rights (typically known as strategic lawsuits against public participation, or SLAPPs), the Legislature has authorized a special motion to strike claims that are based on a defendant's engagement in such protected activity. (See Code Civ. Proc., § 425.16, subd. (a).) We consider a question that has generated uncertainty in the Courts of Appeal: What nexus must a defendant show between a challenged claim and the defendant's protected activity for the claim to be struck?

**907 As we explain, a claim is not subject to…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Sweezy v. New Hampshire Ex Rel. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. University of Pennsylvania v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by234 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Cable News Network, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Monster Energy Company v. SchechterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Coker v. SassoneNevada Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Sweetwater Union High Sch. Dist. v. Gilbane Bldg. Co.California Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Rand Resources, LLC v. City of CarsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019

229 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API