Legal Opinion

Smith v. East Bay Municipal Utility District

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 19, 1954No. Civ. 15627PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKaufman, J.

Appellant, East Bay Municipal Utility District, the defendant below, appeals from a judgment against it of $3,360 in a suit for damages to plaintiffs’ property alleged to have been caused by an overflow of San Pablo Creek resulting from defendant utility district’s negligence in the operation of San Pablo Dam and Reservoir. • Judgment upon the jury’s verdict in favor of plaintiffs was entered on April 7,1952. Defendant district appeals from the judgment on the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict.

Plaintiffs and respondents, Edward and Florence Smith, husband and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Peabody v. City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Routh v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Natural Soda Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Bruton v. . Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Bruton v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Accardi v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  2. Van Zyl v. SpiegelbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Baldwin Processing Co. v. Georgia Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  4. Grace & Co. v. City of Los AngelesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1958
  5. Kambish v. Santa Clara Valley Water Conservation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API