Legal Opinion

Van Zyl v. Spiegelberg

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 5, 1969No. Civ. 25751PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOLINARI, P. J.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of nonsuit entered in favor of defendants.

Plaintiff and defendants own adjoining property in a mountainous and forested area near Boulder Creek. Defendants’ lot is about one acre in size with its east boundary parallel to a road called West Road and its west boundary adjoining plaintiff’s lot. Defendants’ residence, garage and swimming pool are located on a level part of the property with the western portion of the lot sloping down toward plaintiff’s property.

A stream or creek channel passes through defendants’ lot in a…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Amaya v. Home Ice, Fuel & Supply Co.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Frost v. WitterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Archer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Clement v. State Reclamation BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Raber v. TuminCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. El Escorial Owners' Ass'n v. DLC Plastering, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. Lussier v. San Lorenzo Valley Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. Salinero v. PonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. Hinckley v. La Mesa R. v. Center, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. White v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API