Legal Opinion

Kain v. Bare

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 28, 1892No. 499PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Huntington Circuit Court:

1Opinion of the CourtReinhard, J.

Action by the appellant against the appellees on the following promissory note :

“February 5,1887. On or before Oct. 1,1887, after date, we promise to-pay to the order of John W. Kain, at Citizens’ Bank of Huntington, Indiana, two hundred and four and -jS-gSg- dollars, value received, without any relief from valuation or appraisement laws, with interest at eight per cent. *441per annum until paid, and attorney’s fees. The drawers and endorsees severally waive presentment for payment, protest, and notice of protest and non-payment of this note. “$204.10. Henry Bare,
“Lydia Bare.”

It was averred in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Platter v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Sims v. City of FrankfortIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Hosford v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Giberson v. JolleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Schmueckle v. WatersIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schrenger v. Caesars IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. Southern Indiana Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1904
  3. Pope v. Branch County Savings BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
  4. Millett v. Aetna Trust & Savings Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1919
  5. Gilchrist v. HatchIndiana Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API