Legal Opinion

Schrenger v. Caesars Indiana

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 19, 2005No. 10A01-0408-CV-349PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SULLIVAN, Judge.

Appellant-Defendant, Ty J. Schrenger, appeals from the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Appellee-Plain-tiff, Caesars Indiana ("Caesars"), 1 in Caesars' action seeking to recover $25,000 in credit it had extended to Schrenger. Upon appeal, Schrenger presents two issues, which we restate as: (1) whether Indiana Code §$ 34-16-1-1 prevents Caesars from collecting on the debt, and (2) whether Caesars was unjustly enriched by the trial court's judgment. Caesars presents one issue upon cross-appeal: whether the trial court erred in not awarding it treble…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Indiana Gaming Commission v. MoseleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. NixonIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Ballard v. HarmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. White v. Indiana Realty Associates IIIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  5. MDM INVESTMENTS v. City of CarmelIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Caesars Riverboat Casino, LLC v. KephartIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Wysocki v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Lake County Sheriff's Merit Board v. BuncichIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Warriner v. DC MARSHALL JEEPIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Donovan v. Grand Victoria Casino & Resort, L.P.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2009

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API