Legal Opinion

Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. Southern Indiana Railway Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 6, 1904No. 4,615PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Erom Lawrence Circuit Court; W. E. Martin, Judge. Suit by tbe Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Eailway Company against the Southern Indiana Eailway Company. Erom a decree for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRoby, J.

Demurrers were sustained to each of the three paragraphs of appellant’s complaint, and the correctness of such action is the question for decision.

A written contract, executed by the Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Eailway Company, as the party of the first part, and by the Evansville & Eichmond Eailway Company, as party of the second part, is filed with each paragraph and forms the basis for the relief prayed, which in the first and second paragraphs is specific performance of the contract, and in the third, judgment for the reasonable cost of constructing the interlocking switch specified…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Co. v. DolanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Loud v. Pomona Land & Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Edwards County v. JenningsTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Wooten v. . WaltersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  5. West Virginia Transportation Co. v. Ohio River Pipe Line Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1883

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. BaughIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Mann v. BradySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Venner v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  4. Ness v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Tousey v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1911

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API