Legal Opinion

Giberson v. Jolley

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1889No. 13,922PublishedCited by 45 opinions

From the St. Joseph Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.

The evidence in this case warranted the jury in concluding that the promissory note on which the appellant’s complaint is founded was obtained by fraud. The appellee was induced to sign the note by a cufmingly devised scheme, preconcerted for the purpose of deceiving him, and made effective by false statements. The appellant is in error in assuming that all that the payee of the note did was to misrepresent the value and qualities of the so-called Bohemian oats which he induced the appellee to buy. Artifices were resorted to, and these were made means of deception.

The only question in the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Goodwin v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Scotten v. RandolphIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Zook v. SimonsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Mitchell v. TomlinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Shearer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1844

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. McNight v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  2. Ray v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Farmers Loan & Trust Co. v. Canada & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Shirk v. NeibleIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Schmueckle v. WatersIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API