Legal Opinion

In Re Reinstatement of Singer

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 26, 2007No. A05-1136PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

David A. Singer filed a petition for reinstatement following his indefinite suspension from the practice of law. A panel of the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board recommended against Singer’s reinstatement, concluding that Singer had failed to provide clear and convincing evidence that he has satisfactorily addressed his wrongful conduct or the motivations for that conduct. The panel also concluded that Singer failed to provide clear and convincing evidence that, if reinstated, misconduct is not likely to occur. The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against PokornySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. In Re Reinstatement to the Practice of Law of KadrieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  3. In Re Reinstatement of RamirezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  4. In Re Reinstatement of JellingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against SingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001

4Cited by10 opinions

  1. In re Disciplinary Action Against FruSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  2. In re Reinstatement of StockmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  3. In Re Petition for Reinstatement of DedefoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  4. In Re Petition for Reinstatement of MoseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  5. In re Reinstatement of MoseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API