Legal Opinion
In Re Reinstatement of Ramirez
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 17, 2006No. A04-2499PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
In this case we consider the recommendation of a three-member panel of the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board that disbarred attorney, petitioner Sharon Ramirez, be conditionally reinstated to the practice of law in Minnesota. The Director of the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board (the director) challenges the panel’s conclusion that Ramirez has proved by clear and convincing evidence that she has undergone the requisite moral change to render her fit to resume the practice of law. The director recommends that Ramirez be denied reinstatement. We have independently…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- Application of SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Matter of Reinstatement of WegnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- In Re Reinstatement to the Practice of Law of KadrieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against AnderleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- In Re Reinstatement of TrygstadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by10 opinions
- In re Reinstatement of StockmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- In Re Reinstatement of SingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Milligan v. Board of Professional ResponsibilityTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
- In Re Reinstatement of JellingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- In re Reinstatement of MoseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.