Legal Opinion

In Re Reinstatement of Jellinger

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 22, 2007No. A05-2091PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

A panel of the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board recommended that petitioner Richard T. Jellinger, who was indefinitely suspended from the practice of law, be reinstated subject to a four-year probationary period and other terms and conditions, including a restriction on the practice of law as a solo practitioner and a requirement that he apply for malpractice insurance. Jellinger argues that the length of the probationary period and the terms and conditions on his probation are inconsistent with the panel’s findings of fact. The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional…

3Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against PlummerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  2. In Re Reinstatement to the Practice of Law of KadrieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  3. In Re Reinstatement to the Practice of Law of AnderleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  4. In Re Reinstatement of RamirezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  5. Petition of HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re Reinstatement of StockmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  2. In Re Petition for Reinstatement of DedefoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  3. In Re Petition for Reinstatement of MoseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  4. In Re Reinstatement of SingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  5. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against HolkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API