Legal Opinion
In re Reinstatement of Mose
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 12, 2014No. A12-0380PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Petitioner William G. Mose, who has been suspended from the practice of law since 1990, filed his second petition for reinstatement in March 2012 alleging that he had undergone the requisite moral change and was fit to practice law. The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility assigned the matter to a three-member panel of the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board (LPRB). The panel conducted a hearing and later filed its findings, conclusions, and recommendation that the petition be denied. Mose ordered a transcript of the panel’s hearing and the matter…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re Reinstatement to the Practice of Law of KadrieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- In Re Discipline of SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- In Re Reinstatement to the Practice of Law of AnderleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- In Re Reinstatement of ReutterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- In Re Petition for Reinstatement of MoseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by9 opinions
- In re Reinstatement of StockmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- In Re Petition for REINSTATEMENT OF Carol Lynn O’GARA, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0230790Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- In re SeversonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
- In Re Petition for Reinstatement of Clark Calvin GRIFFITH, II, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0175638Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- In Re Petition for REINSTATEMENT OF Bobby Gordon Onyemeh SEA, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0282807Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.