Legal Opinion
In Re Petition for Reinstatement of Dedefo
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 15, 2010No. A09-691PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
On July 17, 2008, we indefinitely suspended petitioner Nuro Bedhaso Dedefo from the practice of law, with no right to apply for reinstatement for a minimum of six months. On April 6, 2009, Dedefo filed a petition for reinstatement with the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility. After a hearing, a Panel for the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board (Panel) recommended against Dedefo’s reinstatement. The Director accepted that recommendation. Dedefo challenges the recommendation and argues that he has met his burden of proving he is fit to return to the practice of law. We…
3Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re the Reinstatement of PETERSONSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Matter of Reinstatement of WegnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- In Re Application of Strand for Reinstatement to Practice LawSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- In Re Reinstatement to the Practice of Law of KadrieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- In Re Discipline of SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by11 opinions
- In re Disciplinary Action Against MontezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- In re Disciplinary Action Against NwaneriSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- In re Reinstatement of StockmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- In re Disciplinary Action Against AlbrechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- In re Reinstatement to the Practice of Law of LieberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.