Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Smith

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 7, 1976No. 753SC677PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

Plaintiff first assigns as error that the court failed to charge the jury in accordance with plaintiff’s request for instructions as to the duty the law imposes upon a motorist who sees, or by the exercise of reasonable care should see, children on or near the highway. Although the court did not instruct the jury in the exact language requested, plaintiff concedes that the court gave similar instructions, and comparison reveals that the instructions given were in essence those requested. A litigant is not entitled to have the trial judge instruct the jury in the exact words…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chalmers v. WomackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Winters Ex Rel. Gordon v. BurchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. Allen v. ForemanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  4. Key v. Merritt-Holland Welding Supplies, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Alston v. MonkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  2. Streeter v. CottonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. State v. ConardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Barber v. Woodmen of World Life Insurance SocietyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  5. Thompson v. JamesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API