Legal Opinion

Younts v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 16, 1972No. 96PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice.

Plaintiff contends the trial court erred in granting defendant’s motion for a directed verdict at the close of plaintiff’s evidence.

On a motion for a directed verdict by the defendant, the court must consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, and may grant the motion only if, as a matter of law, the evidence is insufficient to justify a verdict for the plaintiff. G.S. 1A-1, Rule 50(a), Rules of Civil Procedure; Adler v. Insurance Co., 280 N.C. 146, 185 S.E. 2d 144 (1971); Kelly v. Harvester Co., 278 N.C. 153, 179 S.E. 2d 396 (1971); 5A Moore’s Federal…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kelly v. International Harvester CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Bowen v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  3. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. HayesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  4. Kirk v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. Adler v. Lumber Mutual Fire Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. PakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Summey v. CauthenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. Helms v. ReaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  4. Smith v. VonCannonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API