Younts v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Justice.
Plaintiff contends the trial court erred in granting defendant’s motion for a directed verdict at the close of plaintiff’s evidence.
On a motion for a directed verdict by the defendant, the court must consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, and may grant the motion only if, as a matter of law, the evidence is insufficient to justify a verdict for the plaintiff. G.S. 1A-1, Rule 50(a), Rules of Civil Procedure; Adler v. Insurance Co., 280 N.C. 146, 185 S.E. 2d 144 (1971); Kelly v. Harvester Co., 278 N.C. 153, 179 S.E. 2d 396 (1971); 5A Moore’s Federal…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kelly v. International Harvester CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Bowen v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. HayesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Kirk v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Adler v. Lumber Mutual Fire Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Dickinson v. PakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Summey v. CauthenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Helms v. ReaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Smith v. VonCannonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.