Shermaster v. California Home Building Loan Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Thomas F. Graham, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWaste, P. J.
Plaintiff had judgment rescinding and canceling two contracts of sale and purchase of real property, and defendant appeals.
From the findings of fact, which are amply supported by the evidence, it appears that the parties entered into two contracts in writing, whereby they mutually agreed that defendant should sell, and plaintiff should buy from defendant, two lots of land situated in the city and county of San Francisco. The particular description of the lot of land, in each contract, began as follows: “Commencing at a point on the westerly line of Wieland Street, distant thereon, etc., from…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Spreckels v. GorrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- People v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Dow v. SwainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Gates v. McLeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Kofoed v. GordonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Wal-Noon Corp. v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Mott v. ClineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Runyan v. Pacific Air Industries, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Schaff v. KennellyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
- Lobdell v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.