Legal Opinion

Sprague v. Walton

California Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1904No. Sac. No. 1269PublishedCited by 39 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.

This is an action by one of the executors of the will of Moses Sprague to recover from the executrix of Nancy Sprague (who was the wife of Moses) a sum of about thirty-eight hundred dollars, the amount of two savings-bank deposits—community property of the spouses originally standing in the name of Moses, but drawn out by her under written authority from him and redeposited in her own name shortly before his death.

B. F. Walton, named as a defendant, is the co-executor of the plaintiff, and is made a defendant only because he refused to be joined as a plaintiff. No relief is sought against…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Booth v. Oakland Bank of SavingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Zeller v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Hope v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Williams v. KiddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Hansen v. Bear Film Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Whitlow v. DurstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Moore v. TrottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Wallace v. RileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API