Legal Opinion

Zeller v. Jordan

California Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1894No. 15775PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtDe Haven, J.

Action to recover from the defendant, the German Savings and Loan Society, the sum of niue*146teen thousand eight hundred and seven dollars and seventy-four cents, deposited with said defendant by Sophia Stein eke, who afterwards became the wife of plaintiff, and is now deceased. The defendant, Jordan, is the executor of the last will of the said Sophia, and is made a party to this action by reason of the fact that he claims said deposit as a part of the estate of his said testator. The superior court rendered judgment in his favor, and the plaintiff appeals.

The plaintiff alleges in his complaint…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ridden v. . ThrallNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Williams v. . GuileNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Daniel v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ruiz v. DowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Crocker v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Sprague v. WaltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. Beebe v. CoffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API