Legal Opinion

State v. Lutz

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1988No. TC 85-4260-C-3, 85-4270-C-3; CA A41902, A41903; SC S35161PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN HOOMISSEN, J., pro tempore.

Defendant appeals his convictions for harassment and sexual abuse in the first degree. ORS 166.065,163.425. He contends that the trial court abused its discretion in discharging a juror and committed an error of law in continuing his trial with only 11 jurors. The Court of Appeals held that he waived any objection to the discharge. However, it vacated his conviction and remanded the case to the trial court to determine whether he had consented to be tried by an 11-person jury. State v. Lutz, 90 Or App 247, 752 P2d 845 (1988). The dispositive issue is whether the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. HickmannOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Guinn v. CuppOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. LutzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. GeistOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. PorterOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. CastrejonOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. WiltseOregon Supreme Court · 2024
  5. Goodwin v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API