Legal Opinion

State v. Lutz

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 6, 1988No. 85-4260-C-3 & 85-4270-C-3; CA A41902 & A41903PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Defendant appeals his convictions for harassment and sexual abuse in the first degree. The verdicts were returned by an 11-member jury, and defendant protests that he was denied the right under ORS 136.210(1) to have his case decided by a 12-member jury. He also challenges the indictment and two evidentiary rulings. We remand for the trial court to determine whether defendant consented to be tried by an 11-member jury.

The charges involved sexual conduct with defendant’s daughter. Trial began on April 16,1986, and a jury of 12 members was empaneled. The following morning one of the jurors…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stanfield v. LaccoarceOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Guinn v. CuppOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. KellerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  4. State v. MilsteadCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  5. State v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. DawsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. State v. LutzOregon Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API