State v. Lutz
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.
Defendant appeals his convictions for harassment and sexual abuse in the first degree. The verdicts were returned by an 11-member jury, and defendant protests that he was denied the right under ORS 136.210(1) to have his case decided by a 12-member jury. He also challenges the indictment and two evidentiary rulings. We remand for the trial court to determine whether defendant consented to be tried by an 11-member jury.
The charges involved sexual conduct with defendant’s daughter. Trial began on April 16,1986, and a jury of 12 members was empaneled. The following morning one of the jurors…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Stanfield v. LaccoarceOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Guinn v. CuppOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. KellerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- State v. MilsteadCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- State v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. DawsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- State v. LutzOregon Supreme Court · 1988