Legal Opinion

State v. Castrejon

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1993No. CC 9004-32451; CA A66770; SC S39642PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUnis, J.

The issues in this criminal case are whether a jury-instruction on reasonable doubt was proper and whether an unpreserved claim of error is available for appellate review.

Defendant was charged with unauthorized use of a vehicle, ORS 164.135. The trial court gave the jury the following instruction on reasonable doubt:

“Now, the law presumes the defendant is innocent. The burden is upon the State to prove that the defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Reasonable doubt means just that. After considering all of the evidence, if you have a reasonable doubt as to defendant’s guilt, then you…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Cage v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Eric Allen Peterson v. Robert LampertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. State v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. BucholzOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. FarmerOregon Supreme Court · 1993

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API