Legal Opinion

Goodwin v. State of Oregon

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 12, 1992No. 90-05-162 CV; CA A66807PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*281WARREN, J.

The state appeals a judgment granting petitioner post-conviction relief. We affirm.

The petition alleges that petitioner’s conviction for criminal nonsupport, ORS 163.555, is unlawful, because the district attorney had excused one of the grand jurors from attendance at the session in which evidence against petitioner was presented and an indictment returned against him.1 The post-conviction court held that, because Article VII (amended), section 5(2), of the Oregon Constitution2 mandates a seven-person grand jury, the district attorney’s action violated the Constitution and rendered…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Apodaca v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. GortmakerOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. LawrenceOregon Supreme Court · 1885
  5. State v. LutzOregon Supreme Court · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. PrattOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. GoodwinCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  3. Goodwin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. State v. CongerOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State Ex Rel. Schrunk v. BonebrakeOregon Supreme Court · 1994

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API