Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Shattuck
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 7, 1938PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
The only issues pursued concern the conclusions of the trial court that the defendant was negligent, that this was a proximate cause of the plaintiff’s injury, and that the plaintiff was free from contributory negligence. The relevant facts found by the court are in substance these. Windsor Street in Hartford has a concrete surface thirty-four and one-half feet in width and at the place where this accident happened is level, straight and heavily traveled. In broad daylight on June 14, 1937, the defendant was operating an automobile northerly along the dry roadway of this street, following a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Davis v. MargolisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Rozycki v. Yantic Grain & Products Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Gross v. Boston, W. N.Y. St. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Skovronski v. GenoveseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Cuneo v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Kinderavich v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Neal v. Shiels, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Miranti v. Brookside Shopping Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Antenucci v. Hartford Roman Catholic Diocesan CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Bridgeport Hydraulic Co. v. SciortinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.