Melancon v. Walt Disney Productions
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
This proceeding is a motion for a summary reversal of the order of the superior court denying defendants’ motion that plaintiff be required to furnish security pursuant to the provisions of sections 830 and 834 of the Corporations Code.
Defendants’ motion was denied by the trial court by an order reading, in part, as follows: “That the defendant, Walt Disney Incorporated, a corporation, is not a defendant entitled to indemnity from the defendant Walt Disney Productions, a corporation, within the meaning of California Corporations Code, section 830, but is a third party defendant, and the Court…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Estate of WunderleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Beyerbach v. Juno Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
- Melancon v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Toohey v. TooheyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Tarpley v. EppersonTexas Supreme Court · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Efron v. KalmanovitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Landberg v. LandbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Bailey v. Fosca Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
- People v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- United States v. EgelakDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1959
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.