Legal Opinion
Efron v. Kalmanovitz
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 5, 1960No. Civ. 24243PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARDS, J. pro tem. *
Appeals from an order denying the motions of several defendants that the plaintiffs furnish security in a stockholders’ derivative suit; from an order denying defendants’ motions to reconsider and vacate the order denying the motions for security and from an order denying defendants’ motions for a new trial of the motions for security.
Plaintiffs, as stockholders of Maier Brewing Company, filed a stockholders’ derivative suit against Maier Brewing Company; its board of directors; Paul Kalmanovitz, its majority stockholder, and S & P Company, a corporation wholly owned by…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- McKane v. DurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Jaffe v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. BentleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Powers v. City of RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Truck Insurance Exchange v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Pazderka v. Caballeros Dimas Alang, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Burt v. Irvine Co.California Court of Appeal · 1965
- In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Towers, Perrin, Forster & Crosby, Inc. v. B. Peter Brown and David F. RidingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.