Landberg v. Landberg
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOLINARI, P. J.
This is an appeal from an order in a divorce action denying defendant and cross-complainant (hereinafter “defendant”) Roslyn Landberg’s motion for an order declaring that she had exercised her right to buy plaintiff and cross-defendant (hereinafter “plaintiff”) Edward Landberg’s stock in two corporations pursuant to the provisions of an agreement entered into between them, and between them and said corporations.
Plaintiff has not filed a respondent’s brief. Therefore, pursuant to rule 17(b) of the California Rules of Court, we accept as true the statement of facts in…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Albers v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Drennan v. Star Paving Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
- King v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Augustine v. TruccoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Robbins v. Pacific Eastern Corp.California Supreme Court · 1937
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Adrian L. Cristobal v. Jeffrey SiegelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Poster v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Bank of California v. ConnollyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Palo Alto Town & Country Village, Inc. v. Bbtc CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Cook v. CraigCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.