Legal Opinion

Landberg v. Landberg

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 5, 1972No. Civ. 27190PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOLINARI, P. J.

This is an appeal from an order in a divorce action denying defendant and cross-complainant (hereinafter “defendant”) Roslyn Landberg’s motion for an order declaring that she had exercised her right to buy plaintiff and cross-defendant (hereinafter “plaintiff”) Edward Landberg’s stock in two corporations pursuant to the provisions of an agreement entered into between them, and between them and said corporations.

Plaintiff has not filed a respondent’s brief. Therefore, pursuant to rule 17(b) of the California Rules of Court, we accept as true the statement of facts in…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Albers v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Drennan v. Star Paving Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
  3. King v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Augustine v. TruccoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Robbins v. Pacific Eastern Corp.California Supreme Court · 1937

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Adrian L. Cristobal v. Jeffrey SiegelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  2. Poster v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Bank of California v. ConnollyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. Palo Alto Town & Country Village, Inc. v. Bbtc CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Cook v. CraigCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API