Legal Opinion

Beyerbach v. Juno Oil Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1954No. L. A. 22341PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

Plaintiff, a stockholder of defendant Juno Oil Company, instituted a stockholder’s derivative suit to compel defendants Henderson and Carpenter to transfer a certain oil. lease to defendant Juno Oil Company and to account for and pay to Juno sums received under the lease as rents and royalties. Defendants moved, under section 834 of the Corporations Code, for an order- requiring plaintiff to furnish security for reasonable expenses which might be *16incurred by defendants in connection with the action. Plaintiff failed to deposit security as ordered by the trial court and the court dismissed the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. CadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Escobedo v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Wickersham v. CrittendenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Whitten v. DabneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Gagnon Co., Inc. v. Nevada Desert InnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Fletcher v. A. J. Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. People v. Wilshire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. ClevengerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  5. Feen v. RayIllinois Supreme Court · 1985

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API