Peterson v. Township of Manchester
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.
This is an appeal from a judgment affirming an order of a town board laying out a public road. The question of damages was submitted to a jury. No motion for amended findings nor for a new trial was made.
Appellant does not seek to review the sufficiency of the evidence, but he seeks to review only the instructions to the jury. He made no objections in the trial of the case to any part of the charge, and took no exception to any part thereof. It is our understanding that every ruling on the trial on a question of law, to which an exception has been taken, and any instruction to the jury, to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kelly v. RogersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874
- Le Mieux v. CosgroveSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Cincinnati Time Recorder Co. v. LoeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Esterly-Hoppin Co. v. BurnsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Petruschke v. KamererSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lundblad v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- LeMay v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Honeymead Products Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Parker v. FrybergerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Adjustment Service Bureau, Inc. v. BuelowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.