Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Time Recorder Co. v. Loe

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 16, 1922No. 22,864PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

Action to recover the contract price of a time recorder sold by the plaintiff to the defendant. The defendant alleged a breach of warranty. There were findings for the plaintiff for the amount demanded, and a finding that none of the allegations of the answer were true. The defendant appeals from the judgment.

The defendant claims that there was error in rulings on evidence. An appeal from a judgment does not bring for review errors in rulings on evidence unless an objection is made and exception taken at the time, or an objection made at the trial and error specified in the motion for a new…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. American Engine Co. v. CrowleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  2. Petruschke v. KamererSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  3. De Blois v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  4. Anker v. Chicago Great Western RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  5. Hrdlicka v. HabermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Le Mieux v. CosgroveSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  2. Papke v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  3. Stevens v. Minneapolis Fire Department Relief Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  4. Potvin v. PotvinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  5. Peterson v. Township of ManchesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API