Legal Opinion

Adjustment Service Bureau, Inc. v. Buelow

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 6, 1936No. 30,676PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

I. M. Olsen, Justice.

The defendant Dr. Rolf P. Hartig is a dentist, practicing in Minneapolis. Prior to September 3, 1932, the defendants Rose Buelow and her husband, Vernon M. Buelow, became indebted to defendant Hartig in the sum of $190 for dental work and services. The Buelows had been unable to pay the bill although demands had been máde for. its payment. They were in financial difficulties and unable to pay. Plaintiff is a corporation engaged in the business of advancing money to needy clients for the purpose of paying pressing bills against such clients, and in doing that it seeks to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Le Mieux v. CosgroveSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  2. Potvin v. PotvinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  3. Cincinnati Time Recorder Co. v. LoeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  4. Peterson v. Township of ManchesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  5. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Dunn v. Midland Loan Finance Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  2. In Re Disbarment of Ithamar TracySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  3. Altherr v. Wilshire Mortgage CorporationArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Miller v. Colortyme, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  5. Midland Loan Finance Co. v. LorentzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API