Legal Opinion

Honeymead Products Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 15, 1965No. 39609PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Otis, Justice.

Defendants move to dismiss this appeal from an order denying plaintiffs’ motion for judgment n. o. v. or a new trial entered after the time to appeal from defendants’ judgment had expired.

A verdict for defendants was rendered on March 11, 1964, and the clerk of court in violation of Rule 77.04, Rules of Civil Procedure, entered judgment in their favor on March 12 without notice to any of the parties,1 there being no order or agreement for a stay. A timely *148motion for judgment n. o. v. or a new trial was served by plaintiffs on March 25 and argued on April 13, 1964. Although the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Johnson v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  2. Martinco v. HastingsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  3. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. SpaethSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  4. Tombs v. AshworthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  5. Heise v. the JR Clark Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. LeRoy v. Figure Skating Club of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  2. Alholm v. WiltCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  3. County of Washington v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council No. 91Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  4. BROWN'S BAY MARINE CORPORATION v. SkrypecSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  5. Marriage of Iverson v. IversonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API